Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trust In Institutions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,655 hits . Analysis detected 10,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,852 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,605 of 16,482 topics). This Trust In Institutions is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group. Trust In Institutions
Topic details
Total words: 8,852
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 10.3% 10.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst