Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trust In Institutions results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 1,655 hits. Analysis detected 10,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,852 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,605 of 16,482 topics). This Trust In Institutions is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Trust In Institutions
Topic details
Total words: 8,852
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.3%10.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos