Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tribal History results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,407 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (12,019 of 16,558 topics). This Tribal History is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Tribal History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,407
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos