Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video172 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paolo Zialcita results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 53.6% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 470 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of 99% (101 of 6,628 authors). This Paolo Zialcita is worse (more manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Paolo Zialcita
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
99%Paolo Zialcita (selected)18%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 470
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510098.5% percentile
17.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles470 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 53.6%53.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 21.1%21.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 16.4%16.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 18.3%18.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.2%17.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 24.7%24.7%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 9.8%9.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 31.9%31.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Author 53.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 31.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 24.7%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 21.1%, sitewide 3.1%Halo Effect: Author 18.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 16.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 9.6%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos