Topic summary
⁠34%2 analyzed articles/videos848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treatment results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 2,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,392 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,457 of 16,562 topics). This Treatment is worse (more manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Treatment
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,392
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.1% percentile
4.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos