Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Transnational Threats results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,048 hits. Analysis detected 6,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,690 topics). This Transnational Threats is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Transnational Threats
Topic details
Total words: 10,647
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos