Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trail Projects results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 750 hits. Analysis detected 3,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,175 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (1,699 of 15,447 topics). This Trail Projects is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
Trail Projects
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,175
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

89% percentile
025507510089.0% percentile
8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 29.7%29.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 25.8%25.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 10.5%10.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.5%10.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.5%34.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.5%10.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 34.5%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 29.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 25.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos