Topic summary
⁠7%3 analyzed articles/videos5,062 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Track And Field results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,068 hits. Analysis detected 6,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,037 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (15,761 of 16,221 topics). This Track And Field is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group.
Track And Field
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,037
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

3% percentile
02550751002.8% percentile
1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 0.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos