Topic summary
⁠41%3 analyzed articles/videos454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thom Tillis results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 815 hits. Analysis detected 5,334 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,691 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (10,882 of 15,657 topics). This Thom Tillis is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Thom Tillis
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.2%12.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos