Topic summary
75% 14 analyzed articles/videos 22,982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Things To Do results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Indoctrination , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 14,267 hits . Analysis detected 78,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 86,101 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (13,710 of 16,562 topics). This Things To Do is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Things To Do
Topic details
Total words: 86,101
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles86.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst