Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,088 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dinah Eng results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 1,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (5,916 of 6,348 authors). This Dinah Eng is better (less manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Dinah Eng
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠7%Dinah Eng (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

7% percentile
02550751006.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos