Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Midnight Diners results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 2,754 hits. Analysis detected 10,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,668 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,541 of 16,562 topics). This The Midnight Diners is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
The Midnight Diners
Topic details
Total words: 8,668
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.8%31.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.8%13.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos