Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Impact Of AI On Society results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 373 hits. Analysis detected 2,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,198 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,484 of 16,562 topics). This The Impact Of AI On Society is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
The Impact Of AI On Society
Topic details
Total words: 1,198
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510085.0% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 29.5%29.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 31.1%31.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.4%16.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.6%15.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 31.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 29.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos