Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Filter Us results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 65.2% saturation with 2,690 hits. Analysis detected 8,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,591 of 16,562 topics). This The Filter Us is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
The Filter Us
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠85%The Filter Us (selected)7%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 4,128
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 65.2%65.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 24.3%24.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 19.1%19.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.5%12.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 13.1%13.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 65.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Topic 24.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos