Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,974 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lauren Gould results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 4,395 hits . Analysis detected 18,080 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,954 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 91% (638 of 6,628 authors). This Lauren Gould is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Lauren Gould
Author details
Total words: 6,954
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.4% percentile 7.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 63.2% 63.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 27.8% 27.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 22.4% 22.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.6% 15.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 63.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 27.8%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 22.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 19.6%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst