Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karen Yuan results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 63% saturation with 3,704 hits. Analysis detected 12,781 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,876 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (786 of 6,628 authors). This Karen Yuan is worse (more manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Karen Yuan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠89%Karen Yuan (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,876
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

88% percentile
025507510088.2% percentile
6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 63.0%63.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 17.4%17.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 18.1%18.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.6%12.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 63.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 18.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 17.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos