Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These The Changing Nature Of British Society results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 4,614 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,142 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This The Changing Nature Of British Society is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
The Changing Nature Of British Society
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,142
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos