Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Terrorism Designation results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 65.4% saturation with 1,536 hits. Analysis detected 7,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (878 of 16,562 topics). This Terrorism Designation is worse (more manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group.
Terrorism Designation
Topic details
Total words: 2,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

95% percentile
025507510094.7% percentile
12.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 65.4%65.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 30.7%30.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 40.0%40.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.6%34.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 17.3%17.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 15.9%15.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 17.2%17.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.0%11.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 65.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 40.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.6%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.0%Composition/Division: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos