Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tennessee Politics results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 584 hits. Analysis detected 2,921 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,203 of 15,780 topics). This Tennessee Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Tennessee Politics
Topic details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos