Topic summary
⁠1%2 analyzed articles/videos204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tenderloin results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 149 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,299 of 16,240 topics). This Tenderloin is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Tenderloin
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.7%7.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos