Topic summary
30% 6 analyzed articles/videos 196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teenagers results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,171 hits . Analysis detected 8,947 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,226 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,846 of 16,148 topics). This Teenagers is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Teenagers
Topic details
Total words: 12,226
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst