Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Technological Advancement In Warfare results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 812 hits. Analysis detected 4,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,899 topics). This Technological Advancement In Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Technological Advancement In Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 5,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos