Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Techno Capitalism results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 2,264 hits. Analysis detected 11,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,616 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,560 topics). This Techno Capitalism is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Techno Capitalism
Topic details
Total words: 12,616
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 17.9%17.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos