Topic summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Teacher results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 343 hits . Analysis detected 2,965 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,559 of 16,562 topics). This Teacher is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. Teacher
Topic details
Total words: 3,324
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.4% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst