Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Taylor Farms results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 758 hits. Analysis detected 5,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,443 topics). This Taylor Farms is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Taylor Farms
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos