Topic summary
53%7 analyzed articles/videos6,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Incentives results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 4,503 hits. Analysis detected 28,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,080 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (11,428 of 16,559 topics). This Tax Incentives is better (less manipulative) than 69.00% of the peer group.
Tax Incentives
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.0% percentile
2.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.6%9.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate