Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tax Fraud results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 819 hits. Analysis detected 3,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,888 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,599 of 16,562 topics). This Tax Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Tax Fraud
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,888
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.3%4.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 28.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate