Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tariffs And Global Trade results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,094 hits. Analysis detected 3,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,394 of 15,689 topics). This Tariffs And Global Trade is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Tariffs And Global Trade
Topic details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos