Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CHAN HO-HIM results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 1,094 hits . Analysis detected 3,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,699 of 6,321 authors). This CHAN HO-HIM is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. CHAN HO-HIM
Author details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst