Topic summary
92% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,836 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tablets results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 2,469 hits . Analysis detected 12,098 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,624 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 70% (4,966 of 16,510 topics). This Tablets is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Tablets
Topic details
Total words: 8,624
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 4.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 28.6% 28.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 13.1% 13.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst