Topic summary
19% 2 analyzed articles/videos 899 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Synagogue results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 373 hits . Analysis detected 2,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,558 of 16,558 topics). This Synagogue is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Synagogue
Topic details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst