Author summary
29%1 analyzed article/video400 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candice James results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 623 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,227 of 6,627 authors). This Candice James is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Candice James
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
82%Candice James (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 9.7%9.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 2.9%2.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos