Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sustainable Living results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 2,212 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,682 of 16,562 topics). This Sustainable Living is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Sustainable Living
Topic details
Total words: 3,892
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos