Topic summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 321 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court Justices results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 68% (5,341 of 16,562 topics). This Supreme Court Justices is worse (more manipulative) than 67.80% of the peer group. Supreme Court Justices
Topic details
Total words: 1,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 16.7% 16.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Middle Ground: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst