Topic summary
⁠49%2 analyzed articles/videos2,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supplements results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 990 hits. Analysis detected 5,149 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,483 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (12,520 of 16,496 topics). This Supplements is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Supplements
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,483
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510024.1% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos