Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Supplemental Security Income results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Supplemental Security Income is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Supplemental Security Income
Topic details
Total words: 684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles684 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos