Topic summary
⁠37%3 analyzed articles/videos1,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sudan results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 998 hits. Analysis detected 4,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,842 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,304 of 16,562 topics). This Sudan is worse (more manipulative) than 55.90% of the peer group.
Sudan
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,842
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.8%3.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.7%2.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos