Topic summary
11% 2 analyzed articles/videos 513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subsidies results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 230 hits . Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,359 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (12,040 of 16,101 topics). This Subsidies is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Subsidies
Topic details
Total words: 3,359
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst