Topic summary
11%2 analyzed articles/videos513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Subsidies results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 230 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,359 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (12,040 of 16,101 topics). This Subsidies is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Subsidies
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,359
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos