Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Submarine Warfare results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 579 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,050 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Submarine Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Submarine Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 1,050
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos