Legendary WW2 submarine heads to Wisconsin for major facelift 34%

By Andrew Paul22%

7/17/2026, 8:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 220 faulty-reasoning hits from 350 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.2% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,438 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the article peer group.

One of the most decorated submarines of World War II is finally receiving some much needed restoration work. 
The USS Silversides recently arrived at Fincantieri Bay Shipbuilding in Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, for its first dry dock preservation project in over 50 years. 
Over the next three months, workers will inspect the submarine’s structural integrity, clean its hull, and apply multiple protective coatings to safeguard the vessel for decades to come. 
“We are honored to support the preservation of this historic submarine, Fincantieri Bay Shipbuilding vice president and general manager Jeffrey Frank told WBAY . 
“This project requires the kind of careful planning, skilled trade work, and technical coordination that our team takes great pride in delivering.” 
Submarine enthusiasts can tune in from around the world via the submarine museum’s livestream . 
However, viewers will only see an empty inlet for a bit before the real renovation begins. 
Built in less than one year and launched on August 21, 1941, the Silversides is a Gato -class submarine measuring nearly 312 feet long. 
It is outfitted with 10 torpedo tubes, a .50 caliber deck gun, as well as 40 mm and 20 mm cannons. 
The vessel completed more than 90,000 long tons of shipping and sank 23 enemy vessels over multiple patrols in the Pacific theater during World War II. 
The U.S. decommissioned the Silversides in 1946, later placing it service as a training ship for Naval Reservists in Chicago, Illinois. 
Following later restoration work, the submarine was eventually transported to the Great Lakes Naval Memorial & Museum in 1987, and is now displayed at its own USS Silversides Submarine Museum in Muskegon, Michigan. 
“This effort is a testament to what can be accomplished when communities come together to protect and preserve our nation’s history,” added museum executive director Veronica Campbell. 
The Silversides  $3.5 million dry dock preservation is expected to be complete in October before it is returned to its home across Lake Michigan. 
The post Legendary WW2 submarine heads to Wisconsin for major facelift appeared first on Popular Science . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 2.5%Popular Science: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.4%Popular Science: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 3.0%Popular Science: 2.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.1%Popular Science: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 3.2%Popular Science: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.7%Andrew Paul: 4.4%Popular Science: 3.5%Framing Effect9.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 20.3%Andrew Paul: 6.7%Popular Science: 4.6%Optimism Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.7%Popular Science: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 4.3%Popular Science: 3.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Andrew Paul: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias6.3%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.6%Popular Science: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.7%Popular Science: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 5.5%Popular Science: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.2%Popular Science: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 5.0%Popular Science: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.1%Popular Science: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.5%Popular Science: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.7%Andrew Paul: 3.4%Popular Science: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion7.7%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.9%Popular Science: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 2.4%Popular Science: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.6%Popular Science: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.4%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.9%Popular Science: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 2.2%Popular Science: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.3%Popular Science: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.2%Popular Science: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%Andrew Paul: 2.3%Popular Science: 1.5%Unattributed Quote6.9%This article: 6.9%Andrew Paul: 1.0%Popular Science: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 5.1%Andrew Paul: 5.0%Popular Science: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice5.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 1.4%Popular Science: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.0%Popular Science: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Paul: 0.9%Popular Science: 2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

350 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers21%attributed speech277writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJeffrey Frank • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJeffrey Frank • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageVeronica Campbell • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeffrey Frank

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words63% of attributed speech31% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+52.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeffrey Frank: 52.2%52.2%Quote-first Misdirection+52.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jeffrey Frank: 52.2%52.2%Biased Writer Voice-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Jeffrey Frank: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.