Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Naval History results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,649 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Naval History is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Naval History
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,649
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.5%11.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos