Topic summary
63% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Student Activism results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,672 hits . Analysis detected 16,090 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,562 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (12,108 of 16,562 topics). This Student Activism is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Student Activism
Topic details
Total words: 16,562
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst