Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Hossaini results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 759 hits . Analysis detected 3,448 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,434 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,568 of 6,628 authors). This Sara Hossaini is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Sara Hossaini
Author details
Total words: 7,434
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst