Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stroke Prevention results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 1,844 hits. Analysis detected 6,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,282 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,455 of 15,534 topics). This Stroke Prevention is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Stroke Prevention
Topic details
Total words: 8,282
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.3%22.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos