Topic summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Street Art results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 943 hits. Analysis detected 7,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,526 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (11,925 of 15,447 topics). This Street Art is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Street Art
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,526
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.0%0.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 9.9%9.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos