Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivan Ehlers results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 28 hits . Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (75 of 6,170 authors). This Ivan Ehlers is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Ivan Ehlers
Author details
Total words: 56
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.8% percentile 19.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles56 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 50.0% 50.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 46.4% 46.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 42.9% 42.9% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 25.0% 25.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 17.9% 17.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 17.9% 17.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 28.6% 28.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 35.7% 35.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Halo Effect: Author 50.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 46.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 42.9%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Author 35.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 28.6%, sitewide 15.9% Primacy Effect: Author 25.0%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 17.9%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 17.9%, sitewide 0.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.3%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst