Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ivan Ehlers results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 198 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of 99% (75 of 6,170 authors). This Ivan Ehlers is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Ivan Ehlers
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
99%Ivan Ehlers (selected)20%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 56
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

99% percentile
025507510098.8% percentile
19.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 46.4%46.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 42.9%42.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 25.0%25.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Author 17.9%17.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 17.9%17.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 28.6%28.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.3%14.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 35.7%35.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Author 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 46.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 42.9%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Author 35.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 28.6%, sitewide 15.9%Primacy Effect: Author 25.0%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 17.9%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Author 17.9%, sitewide 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 7.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos