Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Strategic Petroleum Reserve results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 915 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,534 of 16,562 topics). This Strategic Petroleum Reserve is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Topic details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510066.6% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos