Topic summary
⁠60%1 analyzed article/video798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stolen Vehicles results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 181 hits. Analysis detected 1,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (10,205 of 16,562 topics). This Stolen Vehicles is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Stolen Vehicles
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos