Topic summary
⁠83%2 analyzed articles/videos1,906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stock Analysis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anchoring Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 1,353 hits. Analysis detected 5,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,718 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (7,403 of 16,562 topics). This Stock Analysis is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Stock Analysis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,718
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510055.3% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 23.7%23.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 14.5%14.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos