Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steel Industry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 577 hits . Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.5% and a BS Rank of 94% (956 of 15,689 topics). This Steel Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Steel Industry
Topic details
Total words: 984
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.9% percentile 11.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles984 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 58.6% 58.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 20.8% 20.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 21.9% 21.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 30.0% 30.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 24.9% 24.9% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 16.5% 16.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Topic 58.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst