Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steel Industry results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 577 hits. Analysis detected 3,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 984 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.5% and a BS Rank of 94% (956 of 15,689 topics). This Steel Industry is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Steel Industry
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 984
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
11.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles984 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 58.6%58.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 20.8%20.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 21.9%21.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 30.0%30.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 24.9%24.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 16.1%16.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 16.5%16.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 13.8%13.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 58.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 30.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 24.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 20.8%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos