Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stealthing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 2,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ā 49% (7,881 of 15,298 topics). This Stealthing is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Stealthing
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 0%Alameda County1%
ā 49%Stealthing (selected)3%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,560
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 17.4%17.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Bandwagon: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Special Pleading: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos